When it comes to diagnosing allergies, two primary testing methods are available: skin prick testing and blood testing. Parents often ask which is "better," but the answer isn't straightforward. Each method has distinct advantages in different situations, and at LACK Clinic, we often find that the tests complement each other, providing a more complete picture of your child's allergic profile.
Before comparing the tests, it helps to understand how each one identifies allergies.
Skin prick testing works by introducing a tiny amount of allergen extract directly into the skin's surface layer. Here's the process:
Skin testing provides immediate results during your appointment and allows for testing multiple allergens simultaneously.
Blood tests for allergies (specific IgE testing) measure the amount of allergen-specific IgE antibodies in your child's blood. The process involves:
Modern blood tests can detect even very small amounts of these antibodies, providing a quantitative measurement of sensitisation to various allergens.
Skin prick testing offers several benefits in specific situations:
Results are available within minutes, allowing your allergist to discuss findings and recommendations during the same appointment. This immediate feedback is particularly valuable when quick diagnosis is needed to guide urgent treatment decisions, when you've travelled a significant distance to get an allergy test in London, or when multiple potential allergens need to be ruled in or out efficiently.
Skin testing may be more sensitive for detecting allergies to:
When commercial allergen extracts don't contain all the relevant proteins (as is the case with some fruits and vegetables), skin testing can be performed using the fresh food itself, a technique called prick-to-prick testing. This approach is particularly valuable for:
The visible reaction provides a tangible demonstration of your child's allergy, which some parents find helpful for understanding the condition. Seeing the reaction develop can make the abstract concept of allergy more concrete.
Blood testing is particularly valuable in several scenarios:
Blood testing is often the preferred option when:
If your child is taking medications that suppress skin reactions, blood testing provides more reliable results. These medications include:
For children with history of severe or anaphylactic reactions, blood testing may be preferred because:
Some children, particularly those who are very young or anxious about medical procedures, may tolerate a single blood draw better than multiple skin pricks. In these cases, blood testing allows comprehensive assessment of multiple allergens from a single sample.
Blood testing provides precise quantitative measurements that are particularly useful for:
In many cases, combining both testing methods provides the most comprehensive assessment. This complementary approach is particularly useful for:
Sometimes a child's clinical history suggests an allergy that isn't confirmed by initial testing. Using both methods can help resolve these discrepancies and avoid missing clinically relevant allergies.
Children with multiple allergic conditions or atypical presentations often benefit from the complementary information provided by both testing methods.
Tracking both skin test reactions and specific IgE levels over time provides a more complete picture of how allergies are evolving. Decreases in both measurements more confidently suggest that an allergy may be resolving.
In some cases, especially for foods like peanuts and tree nuts, component testing (testing for specific proteins within an allergen) via blood tests can complement skin testing to provide more detailed risk assessment.
Both testing methods have limitations parents should understand:
Both tests detect sensitisation (the presence of specific IgE antibodies) but cannot definitively diagnose clinical allergy on their own. Many children test positive to foods they can actually tolerate without reactions. This is why test results must always be interpreted alongside clinical history by an experienced allergist.
No test is 100% sensitive, and both may occasionally fail to detect an allergy that is clinically present. This is more common with certain allergies, such as:
Very young infants may have false negative results because their immune systems are still developing. Repeated testing may be necessary as they grow.
Regardless of which testing method is used, the most important factor in accurate diagnosis is the clinical history – the detailed information about your child's symptoms, their timing, and their relationship to potential triggers. This information guides:
An experienced allergist integrates test results with clinical history to distinguish between true allergy and sensitisation without clinical relevance.
Preparation depends on which test will be performed:
For skin testing:
For blood testing:
Our team will:
Following your appointment, you'll receive:
The choice between skin testing, blood testing, or both depends on multiple factors specific to your child's situation. At LACK Clinic, we consider:
We take time to explain the reasoning behind our recommendations and involve parents in the decision-making process.
Rather than viewing skin testing and blood testing as competing options, we see them as complementary tools in the allergist's toolkit. Each has specific strengths that make it valuable in different clinical situations.
The "best" test is the one that provides the most reliable information for your child's specific circumstances, interpreted by an experienced allergist in the context of their clinical history. Sometimes this will be skin testing, sometimes blood testing, and often a combination of both.
At LACK Clinic, we tailor our approach to each child's unique needs, ensuring that testing is not only accurate but also as comfortable as possible, providing the information necessary to develop effective management strategies for your child's allergic condition.